<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticalData xmlns="http://www.consortiumpublisher.com">
  <Header>
    <ArticleTitle>INTERRELATION OF EXPERIMENT AND THEORY</ArticleTitle>
  </Header>
  <ArticleParameters>
    <ArticleReceivingDate>2017-12-05</ArticleReceivingDate>
    <ArticleRevisedDate>2017-12-13</ArticleRevisedDate>
    <ArticleAcceptanceDate>2017-12-19</ArticleAcceptanceDate>
    <ArticlePublishedOn>2/27/2025 5:10:22 PM</ArticlePublishedOn>
    <Journal>Journal of Experimental Physics</Journal>
    <Volume>2</Volume>
    <Year>2017</Year>
    <ArticleType>Original research article</ArticleType>
    <FirstPage>4</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>5</LastPage>
    <CollectionYear>2017</CollectionYear>
    <PublisherId>J Exp Phy (2017 ). 2. 4-5</PublisherId>
    <ArticleDoi>http://dx.doi.org/10.21065/25205994.2.4</ArticleDoi>
    <Language>English</Language>
  </ArticleParameters>
  <Authors>
    <ArticleAuthors>Vasiliy Karlovich Balkhanov</ArticleAuthors>
  </Authors>
  <keywords>
    <Articlekeywords>Invariance, thermodynamic functions, interrelation</Articlekeywords>
  </keywords>
  <Abstract>
    <ArticleAbstract>It is well known that the experiment will always say yes or no. Theory only will say "maybe." Experiment always requires time and investment. Enough theory to simply lie back on the couch. For the experiment often requires sophisticated ingenuity. The theory relies on the same fundamental laws, for example, the theory of relativity or quantum mechanics. However, the direct applicability of fundamental laws is often impossible due to the mathematical difficulties. Me in my scientific activity, to describe the results of measurements be used various ways to address emerging challenges. Briefly describe some of them.</ArticleAbstract>
  </Abstract>
</ArticalData>