<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticalData xmlns="http://www.consortiumpublisher.com">
  <Header>
    <ArticleTitle>CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS AND POLITICAL DECISION-MAKING: LESSONS FROM THE HAMOODUR RAHMAN COMMISSION</ArticleTitle>
  </Header>
  <ArticleParameters>
    <ArticleReceivingDate>2026-04-29</ArticleReceivingDate>
    <ArticleRevisedDate>2026-06-08</ArticleRevisedDate>
    <ArticleAcceptanceDate>2026-06-10</ArticleAcceptanceDate>
    <ArticlePublishedOn>6/12/2026 12:00:00 AM</ArticlePublishedOn>
    <Journal>DownTown News</Journal>
    <Volume>2</Volume>
    <Year>2026</Year>
    <ArticleType>Review article</ArticleType>
    <FirstPage>487</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>511</LastPage>
    <CollectionYear>2026</CollectionYear>
    <PublisherId>ID N-5730-2015</PublisherId>
    <Language>English</Language>
  </ArticleParameters>
  <Authors>
    <ArticleAuthors>Taha Nazir</ArticleAuthors>
  </Authors>
  <keywords>
    <Articlekeywords>Democratic Governance, Military Influence, Constitutional Governance, National Security Governance</Articlekeywords>
  </keywords>
  <Abstract>
    <ArticleAbstract>Civil-military relations constitute one of the most important dimensions of state formation, democratic governance, national security management, constitutional development, and political stability. In Pakistan, civil-military relations have played a central role in the country's political evolution since independence in 1947. The separation of East Pakistan in 1971 and the subsequent findings of the Hamoodur Rahman Commission represent a critical case study for understanding how institutional imbalances, governance failures, decision-making deficiencies, intelligence shortcomings, and accountability gaps can contribute to national crisis and state fragmentation.</ArticleAbstract>
  </Abstract>
</ArticalData>